A doctor who’s name is Kirt
Said, “this really won’t hurt”
But his huge syringe
Caused me to cringe
And that needle it really did hurt!
Tag Archives: medicine
My visit to the doctors
I visited my doctor yesterday. He began with a series of questions regarding my lifestyle:
“Do you smoke?” he asked.
“No” I replied truthfully.
“Do you drink?” he said.
“Yes, I’ll have a large red wine, please” I replied.
Review Of Elephant Man
Yesterday evening (21 February) I went to see a production of Elephant Man at the Brockley Jack Theatre, (http://www.brockleyjack.co.uk/portfolio/elephant-man/). I would recommend this moving performance which has now, sadly finished, the last one having taken place on Saturday 21 February.
The play tells the true story of Joseph Merrick or as he came to be known Elephant Man. Born in Leicester Joseph came into the world showing no signs of physical deformity. However at an early age signs of physical disfigurement manifested themselves including loose skin and a pronounced bulge on Joseph’s forhead. Joseph appears to have had a loving relationship with his mother, however on her death and the remarriage of his father he left home due to ill treatment and entered Leicester’s workhouse. Following 4 years in that institution Joseph discharged himself into the care of a series of showmen who exhibited him in so-called freak shows. It was at a shop owned by a circus proprietor named Tom Norman that a surgeon from the London Hospital, Fredrick Treves met Joseph. Interested in Joseph’s condition Treves paid Norman for loaning him out in order that medical tests could be performed in an effort to understand Joseph’s condition. On his return to Norman he was exhibited abroad by other circus owners where he was robbed and deprived of all savings.
On returning to the UK Joseph was taken by Treves to the London Hospital (he had Treve’s calling card in his pocket which allowed the police to contact the surgeon).
While at The London Hospital Treves came to understand Joseph’s speech and a friendship developed between the 2 men. Elephant Man’s fame spread which led to visits from well connected society ladies and gentlemen together with invitations to the theatre and trips to the country estate of Lady Knightly.
Elephant Man raises troubling issues of exploitation. Treves is kind and does, genuinely appear to have developed a friendship for Joseph. However despite his genuine regard for him Treves was complicit in exhibiting Joseph for the education (and in many cases) the entertainment of others. Treves criticises Norman for exploiting Joseph which, to 21st century eyes he most certainly did. However Joseph expressed gratitude to Norman for allowing him to earn a living and it was at his own request that he entered the world of freak shows. Given the choice between the harsh rigours of the workhouse and being laughed and jeered at as a “freak” in a circus, Joseph chose the latter because it afforded him financial recompense. There is a sceene in Elephant Man in which a down at heel Norman confronts the prosperous Treves and asks for the return of Joseph. Treves refuses and brands Norman as an exploiter. Norman responds that it is Treves who is the exploiter and that the circus did at least afford Joseph the opportunity to earn money. While Treves certainly comes across as the more humane character he does, to 21st century eyes carry a whiff of the exploiter.
Merrick died at the tragically young age of 27 probably as a consequence of attempting to sleep normally thereby breaking his neck. His skeleton is now in a medical museum although not viewable by the public.
At a time of little governmental provision for the destitute (other than the workhouse) Merrick was faced with little option other than to participate in the degrading freak shows of the time or to throw himself on the mercies of The London Hospital. His treatment at the London was, by the standards of the time humane. It is, however not what Joseph would have chosen had he not been compelled by the force of circumstance to do so. The horror aroused in most people by his deformities led to a much constrained mode of existence which one would not wish on anyone.
Richard Dawkins: Immoral Not To Abort If A Foetus Has Downs Syndrome
Scientist and author Professor Richard Dawkins has caused considerable controversy by stating that it is immoral not to abort a foetus with Down’s Syndrome, http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/aug/21/richard-dawkins-immoral-not-to-abort-a-downs-syndrome-foetus. I have scant knowledge of Down’s Syndrome. I am, however disabled so have a highly personal interest in Dawkin’s comments. Having been born fully sighted I lost the majority of my vision at around 18-months-old as a result of a blood clot on the brain. I have gained a MA in Political Theory and live independently although I must confess to employing a cleaner which stems from my dislike of cleaning rather than the inability to perform household tasks.
As stated earlier, I have scant knowledge of Down’s Syndrome. Due to my lack of understanding I wouldn’t dream of advising women carrying a foetus with Down’s regarding whether the pregnancy should proceed. I most certainly wouldn’t advise a lady facing such a difficult and highly personal decision that they should opt for an abortion as to carry the foetus to term would, in the words of Dawkin’s be “immoral”. The fact is that many parents with Down’s Syndrome children love and cherish them and the danger with Professor Dawkin’s comments is that they can be construed as devaluing people with Down’s Syndrome.
A civilised society should value all people irrespective of disability. Individuals with Down’s will not become leading scientists or world leaders but they are non the less human because of this.
As a disabled person I am used to people making erroneous assumptions regarding my life. I well recollect passing by 2 elderly ladies and hearing one remark “He’s blind” to which I aught to have responded, had I been on the ball “but he isn’t deaf”.
The above comment demonstrates the “pity” which many in society feel towards people with disabilities. In effect such people are putting their own fear of becoming disabled onto people with disabilities. I have, on several occasions had individuals say words to the effect of “I admire you. I don’t know how I would cope in your situation”, failing to realise that I and many other disabled people cope extremely well.
The fear of disability causes people to believe that the lives of Down’s Syndrome individuals and other disabled persons are a constant trial rather than realising that, in many instances our lives are fulfilling.
As stated above I am not an expert on Down’s Syndrome and I am sure that parents of children with Down’s face many issues. However I wouldn’t be arrogant enough to presume to tell potential parents of a Down’s child that they aught (or aught not) to give birth to a baby with the condition. I most certainly wouldn’t tell potential parents that they should abort a foetus with Down’s on the grounds that to carry the pregnancy to term would be “immoral”. Professor Dawkins is a great scientist but ethics and science do not necessarily meet.