I just finished reading the article. I agree that Auslin’s premise is a fascinating one; however, I think his argument is flawed. Epic poetry was a medium of its time, and that time has long passed, with other expressive communication media replacing it. I also think he’s giving fiction short shrift. My final thought on the article is that it would take more than epic poetry to take the politics out of History as an academic discipline.
Thanks for commenting, Liz. I agree with much of what you say. I do think it is a shame that history has become so politicised. As someone who studied both history and politics at university I do think that history should (so far as is possible) be depoliticised. For example condeming men and women from times long since gone is a-historical and is, ultimately completely pointless.
You and I are on the same page on this I think. A classic example of this a-historical position, is asking for reparations for slavery. The trade was (obviously) abhorrent. However, having engaged in slavery the United Kingdom abolished it and spent a great deal of money in patrolling the seas to prevent others from making money from slavery. Now there are growing calls for reparations without any (to my knowledge) clear explanation as to who such reparations are to be given. Its very convenient for people to blame “the west” for all the problems of the world whilst disregarding the corruption of some of the governments pressing for reparations. In my view such calls for reparations stir up racial tensions. One should never forget slavery (and it should be studied), but we need to move on and calling for reparations is not, in my view the way to do so.
I agree with you, Liz. Though (sadly) there is some truth in the oft repeated saying that “the only thing that man learns from history is that man learns nothing from history”. We must, nonetheless do our best to learn from history and not to repeat the mistakes of the past.
I just finished reading the article. I agree that Auslin’s premise is a fascinating one; however, I think his argument is flawed. Epic poetry was a medium of its time, and that time has long passed, with other expressive communication media replacing it. I also think he’s giving fiction short shrift. My final thought on the article is that it would take more than epic poetry to take the politics out of History as an academic discipline.
Thanks for commenting, Liz. I agree with much of what you say. I do think it is a shame that history has become so politicised. As someone who studied both history and politics at university I do think that history should (so far as is possible) be depoliticised. For example condeming men and women from times long since gone is a-historical and is, ultimately completely pointless.
You and I are on the same page on this I think. A classic example of this a-historical position, is asking for reparations for slavery. The trade was (obviously) abhorrent. However, having engaged in slavery the United Kingdom abolished it and spent a great deal of money in patrolling the seas to prevent others from making money from slavery. Now there are growing calls for reparations without any (to my knowledge) clear explanation as to who such reparations are to be given. Its very convenient for people to blame “the west” for all the problems of the world whilst disregarding the corruption of some of the governments pressing for reparations. In my view such calls for reparations stir up racial tensions. One should never forget slavery (and it should be studied), but we need to move on and calling for reparations is not, in my view the way to do so.
I think the best way to right the wrongs of the past is to ensure they (or variations on them) aren’t repeated.
I agree with you, Liz. Though (sadly) there is some truth in the oft repeated saying that “the only thing that man learns from history is that man learns nothing from history”. We must, nonetheless do our best to learn from history and not to repeat the mistakes of the past.
I would go so far as to say that condemning men and women from the past is dangerous if history is rewritten because of it.
Sorry Liz. The order of my response to your latest comment seems to have appeared in the wrong order!