As someone who is visually impaired (I am registered blind but possess some limited residual or mobility vision), I was interested to read the author’s perspective on the portrayal of diversity. I agree, authors should not self-censor as this leads, almost inevitably to pedestrian writing. The writer also addresses the complex issue as to what extent people are objectively disabled and to what degree society causes them to be so. The fact of the matter is that I am blind. No amount of obfiscation can alter that fact. I also regard myself as being disabled in that I have difficulty in performing certain tasks, for example finding my way around in unfamiliar environments. However the perspective of others undoubtedly impacts (sometimes very significantly) on the lives of people with disabilities or other health conditions, (for instance poorly designed environments can make it extremely difficult for visually impaired people to live and work independently). Kevin
Today I am thrilled to welcome Elizabeth Roderick, a colleague from Limitless Publishing, with her thoughts on some complex issues having to do with diversity. Please make her feel welcome and leave a comment.
The Politics of Writing Diversity
Note to readers: I use the term “neurodiverse” in this piece. For those of you unfamiliar with the term, it refers to people generally called “mentally ill”. I prefer “neurodiverse” for reasons I will explain in the article. Thank you for reading.
Writing is a complex art. Words can be interpreted in so many different ways, depending on the background, culture, and experiences of the person interpreting them. We have to be aware of this, especially when we touch on emotional subjects such as diversity. However, if we have political concerns in the forefront of our minds—if we are walking on eggshells trying not to offend anyone—we run the risk of self-censoring, of…
View original post 2,135 more words
I was your 1,500th follower. Your doing well…
Thank you for being my 1,500th follower! Best wishes. Kevin